Search research centre
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
News tags
Archive for February 2012

The long road to nowhere
The idea of the “chicken” game is perhaps most popularly embodied in the automotive duels commonly found in a certain genre of American film. Picture James Dean and his rival accelerating towards the cliff edge in Rebel Without a Cause.
The concept, though, goes way beyond cinematic fender-bending, encompassing anything from quotidian face-offs to Cold War nuclear deadlock. This is why experimental economists have long used “chicken” as a crucial element of game theory’s attempts to explore strategic behaviour in real-life situations.
Dr Swee-Hoon Chuah, of Nottingham University Business School, explains why the idea – and the notion of “frog-boiling” – could be especially relevant to the ongoing government-unions dispute over pension reforms.
Clinging to the past
“Past performance is not a guide to future performance” might just be the most frequently quoted mantra in the world of investment. Most investors will have subconsciously digested it countless times while scanning their annual updates, visiting websites, agreeing to terms or leafing through brochures announcing the launch of this fund or that product.
And yet how many of them actually believe it? The question might sound frivolous, but in truth it is of enormous importance.
Dr Xiao Gang Bi, of Nottingham University Business School in Ningbo, China, and the Nottingham School of Economics’ Globalisation and Economic Policy Centre, explains why this is an issue that is well worth addressing as part of the wider and increasingly crucial debate concerning the role of consumer rationality.
Lessons from the NHS in Scotland
The effectiveness of partnership agreements within the NHS can tell us a lot about what “works” in industrial relations. It might also tell us a little about the wisdom or otherwise of some of the choices made during the past decade by the UK’s national health services.
In the wake of political devolution the NHS in England increased its reliance on a market-based approach. By contrast, as part of a strategy to engage staff in improving services, the NHS in Scotland set about developing partnership agreements at board and national level.
Dr Peter Samuel, co-author of a major Nottingham University Business School report into NHS Scotland, explains why the success of the approach that has been favoured north of the border casts doubt on the wisdom of the path being taken in England.
Scotland’s ‘unique’ commitment to NHS principles
A major report into the NHS in Scotland has cast doubt on the wisdom of its English counterpart’s continued and controversial pursuit of market-based reforms.
The two-year study, carried out by Nottingham University Business School, reveals how a “mature and positive” approach to industrial relations has helped underpin NHS Scotland’s “commitment to high-quality patient care”.
By contrast, the NHS in England has recently faced heavy criticism from the Care Quality Commission, the Health Service Ombudsman and the Patients Association.